HOMEGROWN.ORG

HOMEGROWN celebrates the imaginative, passionate people living HOMEGROWN

Is Farm Aid being irresponsible by offering HOMEGROWN concessions—all that good tasting, family-farm identified, local and organic food - and not giving consumers a good way to burn off a few calories?

Since overweight and obesity in America have reached epidemic proportions, shouldn't something be done to help The Weight (of the Nation, in consultation with the Division of Adolescent and School Health; the Division of Adult and Community Health; the Association of State and Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors (ASTPHND); the Directors of Health Promotion and Education (DHPE); and the National Association of Chronic Disease Directors (NACDD)) ?
http://www.weightofthenation.org

Farm Aid’s HOMEGROWN Village showcases hands-on activities that give concertgoers a chance to meet farmers, get their hands dirty, and learn how family farmers are enriching our soil, protecting our water, and connecting us to our roots ... but they can't add an attraction that would promote healthy physical activity due to "liability concerns"?

According to the CDC, "policy and environmental change initiatives that make healthy choices in nutrition and physical activity available, affordable, and easy will likely prove most effective in combating obesity."
http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/index.html

Is the time ripe for a Farm Aid (Homegrown Village) policy change?

Tags: aid, band, farm, homegrown, village, weight

Share

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I suspect that obesity and problems with excess weight are more likely caused by processed, convenience, "fast" foods. I don't think it's due to lack of exercise or from an excess of organically grown fruits and vegetables.

I do agree that activities to help people get involved and connect with the farms their foods come from would be cool. Certainly if people can offer skydiving instruction and white water rafting outings, the liabilities in having someone visit the farm shouldn't be too excessive. The farms involved probably would have to spring for some third party liability insurance, and come up with a good stiff waiver for participants.

..Christine..

Reply to This

Yes, obesity is absolutely a national crisis that needs to be addressed. We commend your passion and desire to provide solutions to this problem, just as the HOMEGROWN Village and Concessions provide an education and alternatives to the unhealthy processed food options that are so prevalent in the US diet.
Unfortunately, bringing a climbing wall (which is what you have proposed to Farm Aid organizers) to a concert event with nearly 20,000 attendees is not something that is feasible.

All the best in your work for good health! We share the mission.

Reply to This

I agree with JoyfulC that a lot of the problem is more the type and amounts of food being consumed. If you're shoveling in 2 supersized Big Mac meals daily, no amount of exercise is going to help you.

Here's an idea- is there anywhere near the grounds that would allow for some sort of guided nature tour/hike? That's fairly low impact so even those really out of shape or with mild health issues could participate while learning a little something.

I have to say, climbing wall is a bad idea in my opinion. I'll use myself as an example- I'm 5' tall 106lbs, so to look at me you'd think it'd be safe for me to do such a thing- NOT. I have bad knees and asthma. What if I got up there, got out of breath, my knee locks up, I fall and got hurt? That's a lawsuit waiting to happen!

Reply to This

Hi Christine, according to the CDC it is a combination of factors that cause us to lose our "balance"

http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/causes/index.html

and fall into overweight/obesity/health related problems.

Climbing - and yoga - are excellent ways to regain that balance. Free yoga classes are offered every Saturday at the Tower Grove Farmers Market in Saint Louis
http://www.tgmarket.org/

... so ... wouldn't it be wonderful to see them helping folks at Farm Aid too?


They could gather folks around "The Spire" ... :-)

Reply to This

Hi Cornelia and Carrie,

Although it may appear otherwise, "sport" climbing is a safe sport

http://climbing.about.com/od/staysafeclimbing/a/HowSafeClimbing.htm

and climbing walls MUCH taller and larger than the one above can be found almost everywhere, for example this link shows a climbing wall in a retail store in the Oxmoor mall of Louisville, Kentucky (my hometown)
http://www.icsc.org/srch/sct/sct0403/page56.php

Climbing provides challenging exercise for people of nearly all shapes and sizes, in fact the only requirement at this school is that potential climbers have outgrown their diapers ...

http://www.abckid.net/index.htm

... and one can't help but notice that they are located in the U.S. state with the lowest prevalence of obesity! :-)

http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/trends.html

Reply to This

Yeah umm, you see. Money is a real problem. I am sure, if you offered to pay the thousands of dollars worth of insurance, they could accomodate you better.

Reply to This

Well, Trell, Upper Limits carries a $1,000,000 insurance policy for all events, it's included in the wall rental (which I offered to donate).

Trell Johnson said:
Yeah umm, you see. Money is a real problem. I am sure, if you offered to pay the thousands of dollars worth of insurance, they could accomodate you better.

Reply to This

Sherri, I don't understand. What's irresponsible?

Reply to This

michael said:
Sherri, I don't understand. What's irresponsible?

Hi Michael, here's the definition from the Merriam-Webster online dictionary:
Main Entry: 1ir·re·spon·si·ble
Pronunciation: \ˌir-i-ˈspän(t)-sə-bəl\
Function: adjective
Date: 1648
: not responsible: as a : not answerable to higher authority b : said or done with no sense of responsibility c : lacking a sense of responsibility d : unable especially mentally or financially to bear responsibility

For example, John Mellencamp and Willie Nelson (and friends) could have been irresponsible back in 1985 and not offered to donate their time and talent to the first Farm Aid in Champaign, Illinois ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABOCF5UJASE

... but instead, they decided to answer to Higher Authority.

Shouldn't we ALL try to do the same? :-)

Reply to This

Great, thanks for the definition! Very helpful indeed.

Please let me rephrase, and forgive me if I'm missing something, but why is Farm Aid now being irresponsible? From your post it seems like it may have something to do with a climbing wall? Who is Upper Limits? Please elaborate.



Sherri said:
michael said:
Sherri, I don't understand. What's irresponsible?

Hi Michael, here's the definition from the Merriam-Webster online dictionary:
Main Entry: 1ir·re·spon·si·ble
Pronunciation: \ˌir-i-ˈspän(t)-sə-bəl\
Function: adjective
Date: 1648
: not responsible: as a : not answerable to higher authority b : said or done with no sense of responsibility c : lacking a sense of responsibility d : unable especially mentally or financially to bear responsibility

For example, John Mellencamp and Willie Nelson (and friends) could have been irresponsible back in 1985 and not offered to donate their time and talent to the first Farm Aid in Champaign, Illinois ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABOCF5UJASE

... but instead, they decided to answer to Higher Authority.

Shouldn't we ALL try to do the same? :-)

Reply to This

http://www.upperlimits.com/

michael said:

Please let me rephrase, and forgive me if I'm missing something, but why is Farm Aid now being irresponsible?

Well, Farm Aid founded HOMEGROWN.org with the mission to create a place where our love for food and the land evolves, deepens, and becomes something more fulfilling. A place where we can hear and appreciate the BIGGER stories that our food has to share ...


... THAT’s the spirit of HOMEGROWN.org! :-)

michael said:

Who is Upper Limits?

Reply to This

Thanks for clearing everything up!

Reply to This

Reply to This

RSS

Badge

Loading…

Latest from FARM AID

USDA Issues New Regulations Protecting Contract Farmers

JenThe USDA released regulations (PDF link) this week that will provide new, much-needed protections for contract poultry farmers.

Contract farming generally refers to a system in which a farmer raises or grows an agricultural product for a larger company. Contract poultry farmers invest their own money to build poultry barns to company specifications. Under contract, a company delivers the chicks to the grower who uses company feed and medicine to raise the chicks. The company retains ownership of the birds and dictates how the chicks are to be raised. The grown birds then go back to be processed by the poultry company for a previously agreed-upon price based on the birds' weight.

A typical chicken house costs about $300,000 to build, and most companies encourage growers to build at least four houses, for an investment in excess of $1 million. Frequently, growers take out loans covering that entire expense, only to find themselves dropped by the company, often with little or no notice. While there exists the potential for fair contracts in this agricultural system, that has not been the case historically. Contract growers have typically been extremely vulnerable, the contracts tilted against the grower who is subject to the whims of the poultry company. These new regulations issued by the USDA's Grain Inspection, Packers & Stockyards Administration will help change that system.

Under the new rules:
  • Companies must provide farmers with a written copy of the contract before the farmer makes an initial investment in his or her poultry houses;
  • Contracts with confidentiality clauses must allow farmers to discuss contract offers with federal or state agencies, immediate family members, business associates, farmers who contract with the same company, accounting services hired by the farmer, a lawyer or financial advisor before signing;
  • Contracts must state that if a farmer is put on a performance improvement plan (in other words, if they've received a warning that could potentially lead to their contract being terminated), they must be told why, what steps will be taken to help them improve, how they can regain good standing, and the factors that will be used to determine when or if the contract will be terminated;
  • Farmers must be notified in writing within 90 days before a contract is terminated, expired, not renewed or not replaced.
"I'm glad that USDA is taking action to protect growers," said Kevin Hux, a farmer in El Dorado, Arkansas, who raised chickens for Pilgrim's Pride until April, when the company closed its El Dorado processing plant and terminated 170 growers.

"When the company terminated my contract, the company representative left a message on my answering machine saying that the flock of chickens that we had would be our last," Kevin said. "We had no warning. No one should be in that situation."

Mickey Box, a farmer in Berryville, Arkansas, agreed. "Growers have been left in the dark," Mickey said. "When I was put on a performance improvement plan, I knew I could lose my contract. It would have helped to know how I could get back in good standing."

Becky Ceartas, director of the contract agriculture reform program at Farm Aid-funded group Rural Advancement Foundation International-USA (RAFI), said these rules increase fairness, transparency and good business practices.

"Before farmers make the financial commitment to build poultry facilities on their farms, they need to know exactly what's expected and what the terms of that arrangement will be," said Ceartas. "An informed farmer can make better decisions, and that benefits everyone."

Farmers and concerned consumers can get more information about these rules by calling Ceartas at (919) 542-1396 x209 or by visiting www.rafiusa.org.

The Administration will release additional proposed regulations in early 2010 that will deal with other competition and fairness issues in poultry and livestock agriculture—stay tuned!

© 2009   Created by HOMEGROWN.org

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Community Philosphy Blog and Library